Files
cd-browser/docs/ai-development-playbook.md

4.2 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

cd-browser AI Development Playbook

Author: Saky
Purpose: Reusable methodology for building software with AI coding agents.


1. Philosophy

This playbook documents a repeatable workflow for building software with AI agents such as:

  • OpenCode
  • Codexstyle coding agents
  • LLM programming assistants

Goal:

Maintain architectural control and code quality while benefiting from AIaccelerated development.

Core principle:

AI is used as an implementation engine, not as an architect.

The human defines:

  • architecture
  • boundaries
  • specifications
  • validation rules

2. The AI Development Workflow

The method used in the cd-browser project follows this sequence:

Specification → Architecture → Module Scaffolding → Implementation → Validation → Integration → Release

Each step uses focused prompts with limited scope.


3. Repository Preparation

Before using an AI coding agent, the repository must define:

Tooling

black -- formatting
ruff -- linting
mypy -- type checking
pytest -- testing
pre-commit -- commit validation

Folder structure

src/ tests/ specs/ scripts/ docs/

AI agent rules

Defined in:

instructions-agent.md

The file instructs the agent to:

  • read specifications first
  • reuse modules
  • keep changes minimal
  • run validation workflows

4. Prompt Design Principles

Effective prompts follow three rules:

1. Limit scope

Always define affected files.

Example:

Scope: - src/app/navigator.py - tests/test_navigator.py

2. Define constraints

Example:

Do not implement UI yet.

3. Require validation

Example:

Run:

make fix
make quality


5. Example Prompt --- Module Implementation

Example used in the project:

Implement navigator state model.

Scope: - src/app/navigator.py - tests related to navigator behavior

Requirements: - track current path - manage selection - support expansion and collapse - integrate history module - add pytest coverage

Validation: - make fix - make quality

Output: - files changed - summary of implementation


6. Example Prompt --- Debugging

Example debugging prompt used:

We discovered a terminal integration issue.

Problem: The shell wrapper captures stdout using command substitution. The curses UI fails when stdout is captured.

Requirements: - attach UI to /dev/tty - ensure stdout prints only final path - move logs to stderr


7. Prompt Template

Reusable template:

Scope: (list files)

Requirements: (describe expected behaviour)

Constraints: (limit unwanted features)

Validation: (run project tooling)

Output: (files changed + summary)


8. Validation Loop

Every change follows the validation loop:

  1. Agent implements change
  2. Run:

make fix make quality

  1. Review output
  2. Commit if successful

This guarantees stable incremental development.


9. Best Practices

✔ Keep prompts small
✔ Implement one module at a time
✔ Always request tests
✔ Run automated checks
✔ Separate specification from implementation


10. AntiPatterns

Avoid:

large prompts implementing entire applications
vague requirements
skipping validation steps
allowing the AI to define architecture


11. Benefits

Using this workflow:

  • reduces implementation time
  • preserves architectural control
  • ensures consistent code quality
  • enables reproducible development

End